Monthly Archives: April 2016

MAH JONGG AND TEA TOWELS!

Barbara Howard has a wonderful blog that is, believe it or not, all about MY TEA TOWELS! Well, not my towels, but HER tea towels. Anyway, it is all about HER tea towel collections. Last week she did a posting on Mah Jongg tea towels and I thought you would enjoy it. Much thanks to Barbara for letting me repost it!Screen Shot 2016-04-21 at 12.43.32 PM

image

This delightful, if somewhat small and unusually shaped, tea towel with ‘Mine is Playing Mahjong’ at the top, was a gift from Gwyn and Pete.  As many readers of this Blog know, I have known Gwyn since 1979.  Our friendship started through work but has moved on a bit since then.  We have shared meals together, both at home and out in restaurants; we have looked after each other’s cats, and chickens,  while we have been on holiday; we have been on holidays and day trips together; we have planned, and run, courses for professionals working with people with learning difficulties; we have organised and facilitated residential workshops for people with learning difficulties; we have played bingo together, got very drunk and done some very strange ‘disco’ dancing together; we have shared deaths and bereavements and basically spent a lot of time together, through good and bad times.

Gwyn has been fighting cancer, in various forms, for more than 12 years. When she became ill again about three years ago, we began to spend at least one evening a week together with Pete and Liz, playing games and having a meal.  I am not sure we actually planned it, as such, but it felt like it helped make life a bit more normal, so that it didn’t centre just around illness.  There was a ritual that developed – cup of tea (loose leaf of course), piece of cake or biscuit, some games and then food and possibly more games;  Gwyn had to eat little and often, not big meals.  Liz was always good at making home-made soup with produce from the garden – courgette and potato was a favourite when we were all overrun with courgettes.  We tended to play Bananagrams, challenging the brain but something that you played at your own pace and took the consequences for; you don’t get held up by people who are slower than others.  Occasionally, we would play Cranium or Bomb; both Gwyn and I had a lot of games that we could have played.  My New Year Resolution for 2013 (with the co-operation of Gwyn, Pete and Liz) was that 2013 should be the ‘Year of the GamesFest’.  We would work our way through all the games we both owned, systematically, using a Score Rating System devised by Gwyn.  Ratings were based on the pleasure/entertainment value, length of the game, stimulation/challenge value, repeatability and whether we should keep the game or give it to a charity shop.  Gwyn was in charge of scoring.  It was amazing how many games we managed to unearth from our cupboards/attic: everything from Friends of the Forest (Winnie the Pooh and a great favourite of Liz’s and no one else) to Pictionary (popular all round), Scrabble to London Railway Journeys (only really liked by me),  Bomb (big favourite of Gwyn) to Cranium (very popular with everyone), Kan-U-Go (no one liked it but I have happy memories of it as a child) to Dominoes, Cat Attack (I loved the combative nature of it; everyone else liked to be friends with each other) to Baker Street.  There were some games we promised each other we would never play again (Remembering the 60s) and others like Bananagrams which stood the test of time.  We would often play a new game, followed by a quick game or two of Bananagrams.  What we had all forgotten was how good Dominoes was, not just the game but the sound of the tiles clicking together, the ritual of shuffling, the feel of the tiles.  This was another regular.  For some reason, I am not sure why, it made me want to try Mah Jongg.  I knew I’d seen a set and had a feeling that sometime in the past I might have briefly played it.  I just wanted to play another game with tiles (like both Bananagrams and Dominoes) but there was also something mystical about it.  I knew it was complicated.  The others were OK about this but nothing happened because sets are expensive and we would have to learn the rules.  Liz remembered Mah Jongg being played in a Chinese Day Centre for elders that she used to visit and the ‘clack’ of the tiles, and the speed at which it was played.  The GamesFest continued. Then for my birthday, in 2013, Liz gave me a Mah Jongg set, in a leather case.  It was beautiful and incredibly heavy.  Fortunately, she also bought a Rule Book, as recommended by Mr Amazon.  As I opened it, we all looked at it in awe, so many pieces, such beautiful tiles, ‘a place for everything and everything in its place’.

Gwyn has always been in charge of reading, absorbing, understanding and explaining the rules of any game; she has always been the arbiter; we all happily sit back while she does the hard work.  On this occasion we agreed that she would take the Rule Book home and read it and on our next meeting she would explain everything.  There is always a slight danger in this approach in that she has control and sometimes rules ’emerge’ as we go along, that she had forgotten to tell us about; we trust that she isn’t making up the rules as we go along for the purpose of cheating!!  One of the challenges for us all was that none of us had ever really played Mah Jongg so it was not like being taught by someone who was experienced; the first few games (or rather months) were slow going with Gwyn having to check on the rules at every stage of the game.  It was a bit like building an IKEA flat pack.  But we were all ‘hooked’.

The problem with Mah Jongg is that, although it is basically a Chinese game, there are so many variations, including how to spell the name – Mahjong, Mah Jongg (my favourite) and Majiang.  There are American, Japanese, Dutch, South Korean versions, and different versions from different parts of China.  We decided we would stick with the Chinese variation that Gwyn first read; she is basically a good interpreter of rules and has an excellent memory.  This is good because Mah Jongg is a game of ritual: the terminology, how you start, how you mix the tiles, how you build the wall, how you start the game, how you collect sets, how you win and if you do it incorrectly the Ghosts of the Wall are upset.  Personally, I can never remember which is the correct term to call out when you want to pick up a tile: “I’ll have that” is now an accepted phrase and whether something is a Chow, Kong or Pung is beyond my memory.  I even have difficulty remembering the suits although the Rule Book clearly states that players can make up their own terminology; therefore ‘Circles’, in our game, can be ‘Pizzas’, ‘Plates’, ‘Carpet Rolls’, ‘Buns’.  Some tiles have their own particular names: the 8 of Bamboos is ‘M and M’, 5 of circles is ‘X Factor’.  Since August 2013, we have all become totally addicted to Mah Jongg, playing most weeks, sometimes twice a week.  We are on our second special notebook for scoring; while Gwyn is the arbiter of the rules, I am responsible for scoring.  For nearly three years, we have sat at the same place around the table in order that the order of play, and scoring, has continuity.

Basically, Mah Jongg is a game for 4 players and is akin to Rummy; it is a game of skill, strategy and calculation involving a degree of chance.  We have a continuous debate about skill v chance, depending on whether you are on a winning or losing streak.  There is a 3 player version of Mah Jongg (from South Korea and Japan) which we have played on a few occasions when either Gwyn has been in hospital or Pete has been visiting his mother in Brighton but these are scored in a separate book.  Gwyn also discovered a Mah Jongg card game with bamboo card holders.  We have taken this on long trains journeys, much to the surprise of other passengers, where the full game of tiles is impractical for reasons of space and weight.  Mah Jongg is associated with many superstitions; fortunately we haven’t got to rearranging the kitchen to enhance the Feng Shui, nor are we in to wearing lucky clothing otherwise we would never get started.  Gwyn and Pete have contributed a gold lucky cat with a waving arm which can add to the ambiance.  In China, there is a ritual of changing your underwear after a loss; I am pleased that we have not yet resorted to this, otherwise we would never get to play more than one hand per evening!!  Gwyn and Pete also have a set of Chinese suits for special occasions!!

As I said at the beginning, Mah Jongg is a game of speed, not thinking about moves in too much detail.  We haven’t achieved this as yet.  Some of us are more ponderous than others but as the years go on I am sure we will speed up.  The four of us still talk about our fascination with the game; we still play other games, sometimes ending the evening with Banangrams or, if I can persuade anyone, a quick game of Catopoly before we start.

The tea towel, which has a photo shot of the partial Mah Jongg wall, makes me laugh, about how all this got started, what a great form of entertainment it is and how it is difficult to imagine not playing Mah Jongg (unless we fell out with Gwyn and Pete and that won’t happen); I can’t imagine playing Mah Jongg with anyone else; this is our game.  I still have an ambition to use the ‘counting sticks’ as a way of scoring but I haven’t a hope in hell of getting Gwyn, Pete and Liz to try that!!

Do any of you have Mah Jongg-related tea towels? I’d love to see photos of them!

Screen Shot 2016-04-21 at 12.34.58 PM

A GOOD TIME WAS HAD BY ALL!

Thursday, April 14th finally came around and the Stay Strong and Mahj On benefit took place at Sarabeth’s for a yummy lunch, an afternoon of Mah Jongg, lots of candy for snacking during game play, and a welcome gift of a fabulous Baggu with the SSAMO logo proudly printed on the front. There were also great prizes handed out during the day for special winning hands.  I think it is fair to say that we all had such a great time! Enjoy the photos of a very memorable day…IMG_0001The much-loved Linda Feinstein, our honorary chair of the event. IMG_0004 IMG_0005 IMG_0006Barney G. was – as always – the life of the party. We were all so happy that he was there!IMG_1521IMG_0007Here is Alexis with her inspiration, her wonderful mother, Blair. IMG_0040Three of the OMs and my cousin Linda. 

Here are photos of most of the raffle winners. First, the most sought-after prize: the For the Collector package with a fabulous vintage Mah Jongg set along with one of my vintage-style Mah Jongg table covers.IMG_0064The beautiful Breast Cancer Awareness Set donated by our dear friend Lynn, the owner of www.wherethewindsblow.comIMG_0015The Coffee, Coffee, Coffee package winner with a $50 Starbucks gift certificate, a Chambord Press Pot, 3 lbs. of coffee, 2 vintage-inspired Mah Jongg mugs, and an assortment of milk chocolate and dark chocolate-covered coffee beans:IMG_0065The Vino Veritas package containing a case of fabulous wine plus 4 Reidel wine tumblers, a Corkcicle, and a wine stopper. IMG_0066The Let Me Entertain You package containing a set of SmorgasBorges CDs, a beautiful scented candle, a bottle of wine and 2 Reidel wine glasses, a ceramic bowl by J. Warner, and a signed copy of Lior Lev Sercarz’s book, The Art of Blending + 5 jars of his amazing spice blends; all packed in a beautiful and eco-friendly basket.IMG_0067The Read and Write to your Heart’s Content package with a $50 gift certificate to the Corner Bookstore, a Moleskine notebook and accessories, a hand-crafted wooden pen, and lastly, a signed copy of Mah Jongg: The Art of the Game!IMG_0068How lucky is this winner? A gift certificate for one of Tracie Martyn‘s famous Red Carpet Facial plus some of her products.IMG_0069For the Little Loves in Our Lives package – won by a new dog owner! The package contains a $100 gift certificate to Canine Styles, a chock-full of great goodies gift basket (tied with pink ribbon!) from Unleashed, and a bully stick and an antler. This is one lucky puppy!IMG_0070YUM!!! A signed copy of Lior Lev Sercarz’s book, The Art of Blending + 5 jars of his amazing spice blends, Gracious Gourmet‘s chutneys and tea towels, and a huge basket filled to over-flowing with goodies from Grace’s MarketplaceIMG_0071We Love Sarabeth’s! Need I say more?! Many thanks to Sarabeth’s for a wonderful day!IMG_0072Feeling Good! $125 gift card to the Equinox Spa, Haircut with Paul Labrecque, Caviar Luxe Pedicure at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel’s La Prairie spa, and to finish it all off, a manicure!IMG_00736 friends will enjoy an exclusive party at bluemercury, including a makeup artist, goodie bags, refreshments, and after-hours scheduling!IMG_0074Looking Fabulous! A tote bag and $100 gift certificate from J McLaughlin, a beautiful necklace by Luanne Vrattos, and a personal styling consultation with Susan Lawrence, Stylist/Personal Shopper. IMG_0075Dine Like Royalty! And she will with her $250 gift certificate for dinner for 2 at The Mark Restaurant by Jean-Georges.IMG_0076The Melissa Joy Manning $600 necklace and the Mah Jongg at Home and On the Road package were also won but we weren’t able to get the winner’s photographs. I do know that they were thrilled with their great wins.  And once the day was over, Alexis, Blair, Caroline, and I had Mimosa’s and Dirty Martinis – definitely needed when the day ended!Screen Shot 2016-04-15 at 10.28.48 PM

Here are some more photos for you to enjoy…IMG_0011IMG_0024 IMG_0025IMG_0029IMG_0031IMG_0032IMG_0034IMG_0035

I STILL DON’T KNOW THE ANSWER BUT…

Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 11.36.47 PMIt does seem most people believe the situation that my “sista” Johni and I posed to you is not allowed. To remind you of the posting, here is what I wrote:

I’m looking forward to many comments from all of you regarding the following situation. My “sista” Johni and I had a long discussion about this and we were both in agreement that this was a valid Mah Jongg. But this could be looked at differently and not deemed to be valid. What do you think?
A Player had an exposure of three South’s and a Joker to complete the kong.  Someone threw an East and she declared Mah Jongg. As she put up her tiles, she exchanged a South she had in her rack for her own exposed Joker, then put that Joker with three North’s that were in her rack to expose a kong which was needed to complete the Mah Jongg hand. The hand being played was NNN E W SSSS 2015. Was this a valid Mahj?
Two prior rulings by Ruth Unger are key to the discussion here. 
#1 You are able to re-sort your hand into a valid Mahj if you have the correct 14 tiles.
Player calls Mahj and displays her hand, however she has placed the Joker in the incorrect spot in her hand and exposes a pung, pung, kong, kong, instead of a pung kong pung kong. Ruth stated that since she HAD the correct 14 tiles in her hand, it is a valid Mah Jongg, and could simply be arranged correctly. She ruled that you are allowed to rearrange your hand if you have the correct 14 tiles in your hand. 
*This supports the contention that our player has Mah Jongg when she calls the East and is simply rearranging her exposed 14 tiles as allowed.
 #2 You already “own” the Joker if the tile it is used for is on your rack. 
Ruth calls this a “finesse” move. A player holds back a tile that can be replaced on another player’s rack. She waits until her 13th tile is thrown, calls it for exposure, then replaces the tile on the other player’s rack and that Joker gives her Mah Jongg. She is then entitled to a self-picked bonus. Ruth ruled that this does NOT apply if you exchange a tile exposed on your own rack because all you are doing is simply rearranging your own tiles. In essence, you already own the Joker. No self-picked bonus is then allowed.
*This supports the contention that our player already owned the Joker since she had the South tile in her own hand and is allowed to call the single East.
Back to our example …the calling of the single East obviously would not be allowed if she had to exchange a tile from ANOTHER player’s rack, but since it was on her OWN rack, it is allowed. If we apply either one of Ruth’s prior ruling that “any 14 tiles that can be arranged correctly is a valid Mahj,” or that you already “own” the Joker if you have the replaceable tile in your hand, this would mean she would be able to call that single East for a valid Mah Jongg. Both of her rulings seem to support this Mahj being valid. If you don’t agree, please explain.

I received many comments from you, including many from our friend, Stuart W., who posed the question to his entire MJ group. Here are some of the more salient of the comments from Stuart, his friends, and other readers of this blog (this posting is long!). 

***I polled our members. We all agree it should not be allowed.

***I understand the concept of rearranging unfortunately I personally do not agree with it in this instance. I just do not be believe the player in this case is “set” until the joker is exchanged and in her rack and therefore I contend she should not have been allowed to call the east at all.

***Although… if you call the single tile, put your tiles all on the display part of the rack and rearrange them, then you have Mah Jongg… Ann’s argument is that since the tiles all belong to your hand you have the right to arrange them.

***I don’t think the ‘call’ was legitimate, and let me give you my reasoning….In this case, since the ‘E’ is for a singles/pair within the pattern, it cannot be called for Mah Jongg if a substitution has to be made.  A player’s turn begins with the call for exposure, or Mah Jongg.  Only after that can an exchange be made, so that has to come secondary to the call.  If the call was for a Pung or Kong, then fine, but not for a singles/pair for Mah Jongg.

This does not contradict Ruth’s rulings, but the bottom line is that the call for Mah Jongg can’t be made for a singles/pair tile if there has to be a subsequent exchange.  Again, Pungs and Kong calls, then exchanges for Mah Jongg would be OK, but I don’t think a call for a singles/pair Mah Jongg with an exchange that follows would be. Anyway, that’s my 2 cents.

***I agree with M. A tile can only be called for a single/pair if it is for mahjong. In this case said player does not actually have Mah jong until she exchanges the joker which she doesn’t do until after the call. Therefore, she should not be allowed to call the east at all. Next time she should plan ahead and exchange for the joker sooner so she is ‘set” and prepared to call the single tile she needs when it is played. So with my two cents and M’s two cents we now have four cents!

***I’m going to agree with M and G for the same reason. With my two cents we now have six!

***I’ll let you know what I think when my head stops spinning.

***Two prior rulings by Ruth Unger (NMJL) are key to the discussion here.

#1 You are able to re-sort your hand into a valid Mahj if you have the correct 14 tiles.

Player calls Mahj and displays her hand, however she has placed the Joker in the incorrect spot in her hand and exposes a pung, pung, kong, kong, instead of a pung kong pung kong. Ruth stated that since she HAD the correct 14 tiles in her hand, it is a valid Mah Jongg, and could simply be arranged correctly. She ruled that you are allowed to rearrange your hand if you have the correct 14 tiles in your hand. 

This supports the contention that our player has Mah Jongg when she calls the East and is simply rearranging her exposed 14 tiles as allowed.

 #2 You already “own” the Joker if the tile it is used for is on your rack. 

Ruth calls this a “finesse” move. A player holds back a tile that can be replaced on another player’s rack. She waits until her 13th tile is thrown, calls it for exposure, then replaces the tile on the other player’s rack and that Joker gives her Mah Jongg. She is then entitled to a self-picked bonus. Ruth ruled that this does NOT apply if you exchange a tile exposed on your own rack because all you are doing is simply rearranging your own tiles. In essence, you already own the Joker. No self-picked bonus is then allowed.

This supports the contention that our player already owned the Joker since she had the South tile in her own hand and is allowed to call the single East.

Back to our example …the calling of the single East obviously would not be allowed if she had to exchange a tile from ANOTHER player’s rack, but since it was on her OWN rack, it is allowed. If we apply either one of Ruth’s prior ruling that “any 14 tiles that can be arranged correctly is a valid Mahj,” or that you already “own” the Joker if you have the replaceable tile in your hand, this would mean she would be able to call that single East for a valid Mah Jongg. Both of her rulings seem to support this Mahj being valid. If you don’t agree, please explain.

***Here is the answer from the NMJL:  Player cannot declare MJ on a single or pair tile that is discarded if they also needs to exchange  a symbol tile in their hand for a joker exposure on someone else’s hand to complete the hand.  Player needs to call the discarded tile for an exposure (now it is that players turn still) and can then exchange the symbol tile for the exposed joker on someone else’s rack.

***I’ve been collecting the annual NMJL publications, so thought I’d look back through them to see if this question came up in any of the Q&A sections. I didn’t have to go far…check the 2016 flyer, Q&A page, second column, halfway down….”Q. A player discarded a tile that I want to call for Mah Jongg.  However, in order to call for that discard, I would need to exchange a symbol tile in my hand for an exposed Joker.  May I make that exchange and then call for the discard?”

No… You must be able to pick up the discard and make your full exposure WITHOUT the help of the joker.  Your exchange always comes AFTER you call for your discard.”

This is a direct quote, so doesn’t seem arbitrary at all.  The rules are for ‘calls for exposures’ followed by ‘exchange for Mah Jongg’.  We all know you can’t call a single/pair for exposure, so I don’t think there is any way calling an ‘E’ single/pair, then making an exchange works.

***Gladys said it’s valid, but not self-picked. I forgot to add: they are reasoning this to be valid, because the joker exchange/rearrangement was on the player’s on rack.  Obviously this is a no brainer, if the joker had to be exchanged from another hand. That being said, I would not wait to exchange the joker, since it doesn’t provide me with double payment anyway.  But apparently this comes up in tournaments more often than people think.

I personally don’t think it’s legitimate MJ.  I always exchange my joker when playing a concealed hand so I have the ability to MJ if my tile is thrown.  But I understand the reasoning behind Gladys’ opinion. See you in July!

***Unlike those prior to me, I can’t understand how this could be valid where you call a mahj for a pair and then switch out the joker to use with your Norths. Once you call mahj, it ends the game and no other transaction can take place. She should have switched out the joker way before. I understand that the ruling that was put forth was when someone called a tile for a closed hand which was, I believe, the 222 444 666 888 DD hand and displayed it as 222j 444 666 88 DD. The player had to rearrange the J to go with the 8’s to make it a valid mahj. This I can understand. She had only to switch around the tiles for it to be valid. BUT to call mahj and then take a joker off your exposure to put it with your norths doesn’t cut it for me. It would have been different if she was calling the E for a kong like in NNNN EEEE WWWW SS and had that joker in with the W exposure. Then she could have called the E to expose, swap out the J in the W exposure and place it with the N’s and then it would have been a self picked Mahj. I just don’t get it how you can call mahj on a single or pair and then exchange out a joker, regardless if it is in your exposure or anothers. With that being said, as I read the “rule” as long as you have 14 tiles you can rearrange them to make a mahj, does that therefore mean if you are playing a consecutive hand 55 666 7777 888 99 and you call an 8 but accidentally put it up as 88j8 and discard and realize that hand is now dead, but it would have put you on call for the 5, can someone throw that 5, you call it for mahj, rearrange the now 14 tiles removing that j from the 8s and placing it in the 7s so that you now are mahj? I honestly think this opens up a can of worms. I was explaining this to a group I play with at the club this past Thursday (normally between 20 and 32 ladies there at any given time). The lady that runs it just looked at me and her words were “Do you think I’m crazy to tell everyone this? They will go off the wall” So, while Ruth might have been thinking this was a good ruling, and I certainly see where it could apply to the 222 444 666 888 DD hand, I do not agree that it should to a hand such as the one you are putting forth.

***I think the order of things is important here. You cannot call for a tile to complete a single or double. Except for MahJ. At the time this player called MahJ she did not have her three N’s. The joker on her rack was designated a S. No other player could have retrieved that tile unless they had a S. At the moment she called for MahJ, she did not have all of the necessary tiles to complete the hand. If this was a valid move, it must be OK to”bank” your own jokers by keeping them up for exposure while keeping the real 4th tile in your rack and then exchanging them at the last minute. … If this is so, this move is truly a game changer.. . Going back to the order of things: there must be a few lawyers out there; what do you think?

***Regarding Rule #1 – I believe that refers to tiles as you display your mah jongg, however, under no circumstance can you change a prior exposure – once a pung, always as pung, etc.

Regarding Rule #2 – The rule only pertains to the bonus involved with self-picked, This does not address picking a pair for mah jongg. Exchanges have to be made during a turn, (draw or call, exchange, and discard). The joker must already be in your hand since once you call mah jongg you have completed your turn, and nothing can be done once you complete your turn. You are not permitted to call for a pair, except for Mah Jongg – so that has to be the last move or you are calling for a tile for a pair before you have all the tiles in your hand to make Mah Jongg.

My understanding is that to call a discard for a pair or a single can only be done for a Mahj. Once Mahj is declared no exchanging of tiles occurs; the game is over. She should have redeemed the South joker at an earlier turn. She could not have called Mahj without the joker in the North combination, so she did not have Mahj when she called for the East tile.

As for rearranging, the joker was in the South combination when she declared Mahj and it was in place turns before the Mahj declaration. She can’t change that when Mahj is declared. She can only rearrange the tiles newly being put on the rack at the time of the Mahj declaration. If the discard was used for a pong, kong or quint, she would have had to exchange for the joker after she picked up the discard, and then declare Mahj. Again, Mahj can only be declared when nothing more needs to be done. Timing is crucial. This is a tough one. Any other thoughts?Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 11.34.23 PM

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Screen Shot 2015-09-22 at 4.48.50 PMI received the following question from a reader of this blog. I would love to hear your opinions on this: 

We play “open” mah jongg at a local community center and there can be anywhere from about 10 players to 14 players who show up at or near starting time (1 p.m.). We set up tables of four and when one table finishes, East gets up and one of the ‘extra’ players sits down. We rotate this way through the afternoon and it allows everyone a chance to play and to play with different people.
One regular comes late. And I mean late. Like 1 1/2 hours late. And she expects to be rotated in. Several players don’t care but a bunch feel that to arrive 1 1/2 hours after starting time and expect someone to get up and stop playing so she can play is the height of rudeness. (Yes, I’m one of those who feel she is being rude.)
I have never seen anything like this addressed. I have played ‘open’ mah jongg in many locations and when a late comer arrives and sees full tables (yes, we sometimes play 3), they say Hi, I see the tables are full, and then Bye, I’ll see you next week. This is the first time I’ve been exposed to this kind of behavior on someone arriving late.
Your thoughts?

And BTW, next week I will publish the comments from the posting re the player who called a kong discard, exposed it, and next exchanged a Joker from her rack to then call for Mah Jongg. 

SHE SHOULD BE PROUD!

Lisa is one of my star students – she is playing the game now like a true pro. And when the new 2016 card came out, she studied and analyzed it and her hard work paid off. Look at that smile on her face as she declares Mah Jongg with a quints hand of FFFF NNNNN 11111!IMG_0214

BTW, I have received emails from people looking for MJ games in Lower Westchester County, Martha’s Vineyard, and Omaha, Nebraska. If you know of any games in these locations, please let me know.

I’M SO EXCITED!!!

I am so excited about the upcoming Stay Strong and Mahj On luncheon and afternoon of Mah Jongg at Sarabeth’s Restaurant on April 14th! I can’t believe it is less than two weeks away – it seems like eons ago when we started to plan this benefit. And, with much thanks to a fabulous benefit committee and the Tracie Martyn Salon, our wonderful benefit sponsor, we have really fabulous favors, lots and lots of prizes for winning Mah Jongg hands, and amazing raffle packages. Check out the raffle packages:Screen Shot 2016-04-02 at 8.06.24 PMScreen Shot 2016-04-02 at 8.06.47 PMScreen Shot 2016-04-02 at 8.07.12 PMScreen Shot 2016-04-02 at 8.13.16 PMScreen Shot 2016-04-01 at 2.18.19 PMScreen Shot 2016-04-01 at 2.19.10 PM